Blume v. Blume

203 So. 2d 627
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 15, 1967
DocketNo. 580
StatusPublished

This text of 203 So. 2d 627 (Blume v. Blume) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blume v. Blume, 203 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant-plaintiff, Joseph H. Blume, appeals from a final decree of divorce granted in favor of the appellee-defendant and counterclaimant, Sophia Blume.

The primary thrust of appellant’s contention on appeal is the assertion that the trial court erred as a matter of law in awarding the appellee-wife a lump sum award and also periodic payments of alimony. We affirm on the authority of Harless v. Harless, Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 728.

The remaining points on appeal have been considered and we find them to be without merit. See Bennett v. Bennett, Fla.App. 1962, 146 So.2d 588; Picchi v. Picchi, Fla.1958, 100 So.2d 627; Lynch v. Coppola, Fla.App.1961, 129 So.2d 183; Vaughn v. Stewart, 1939, 140 Fla. 88, 191 So. 693.

Affirmed.

CROSS and REED, JJ., and OVER-STREET, MURRAY W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bennett v. Bennett
146 So. 2d 588 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Picchi v. Picchi
100 So. 2d 627 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Lynch v. Coppola
129 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Vaughn v. Stewart, Et Vir.
191 So. 693 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Harless v. Harless
185 So. 2d 728 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 So. 2d 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blume-v-blume-fladistctapp-1967.