Blumberg v. Thomaston-Spruce Corp.
This text of 46 A.D.2d 671 (Blumberg v. Thomaston-Spruce Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to permanently enjoin defendants from violating certain covenants contained in a 1908 agreement recorded in the then Westchester County Register’s office which restricts the use of certain land located in Aubyn Manor, City of Mount Vernon, defendant Thomaston-Spruce Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 8,1973, as granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to the extent of restraining defendants from violating one of the covenants. Order modified by adding thereto a provision that plaintiffs shall give an undertaking, as provided in CPLR 6312 (subd. [b]), in an amount to be fixed by Special Term after a hearing held for such purpose, unless the parties stipulate to an amount therefor. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The granting of a preliminary injunction without provision for a suitable undertaking was improper (CPLR 6312; Rockland County Bldrs. Assn. v. MeAlevey, 29 A D 2d 975). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A.D.2d 671, 360 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumberg-v-thomaston-spruce-corp-nyappdiv-1974.