Blumberg v. Goldberg

261 A.D.2d 250, 690 N.Y.S.2d 237

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered February 2, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, denied third-party defendant I. Rausch & Sons’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[251]*251The motion of third-party defendant I. Rausch & Sons (Rausch) was properly denied since Rausch failed to meet its burden, at this stage of the proceedings prior to the completion of discovery, of tendering sufficient medical proof in admissible form to establish that plaintiffs injuries could be reasonably allocated or divided among the alleged prior and successive tortfeasors (compare, Dubrey v Champlain Val. Physicians Hosp. Med. Ctr., 189 AD2d 950, with Housepian v Kleinman-Cindrich, 226 AD2d 431, and Kalikas v Artale, 124 AD2d 645). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blumberg v. Goldberg, 261 A.D.2d 250, 690 N.Y.S.2d 237 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 250 (Blumberg v. Goldberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kalikas v. Artale
124 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Dubrey v. Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center
189 A.D.2d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Hovsepian v. Kleinman-Cindrich
226 A.D.2d 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)