Blumberg v. Bezozi
This text of 19 Misc. 424 (Blumberg v. Bezozi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We. cannot agree with the appellant that the verdict herein is against the weight of the evidence.
. In fact, as we view the testimony, the verdict could not have-been very well otherwise.
The exception taken by the appellant to the admission “ of any conversation as to a settlement” herein was too general, in our opinion,, to be of any avail- upon this appeal to the- appellant, He should have objected specifically to the questions asked and such objection should have specifically set out the grounds of such objection, and, having failed to do .this, we -think that the exception thus taken cannot, aid appellant,
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Oonlan, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Misc. 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumberg-v-bezozi-nynyccityct-1897.