Blumberg v. Bezozi

19 Misc. 424
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided February 15, 1897·Published

Opinions

,Fitzsimons, J,

We. cannot agree with the appellant that the verdict herein is against the weight of the evidence.

. In fact, as we view the testimony, the verdict could not have-been very well otherwise.

The exception taken by the appellant to the admission of any conversation as to a settlement” herein was too general, in our opinion,, to be of any avail- upon this appeal to the- appellant, He should have objected specifically to the questions asked and such objection should have specifically set out the grounds of such objection, and, having failed to do .this, we -think that the exception thus taken cannot, aid appellant,

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Oonlan, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blumberg v. Bezozi, 19 Misc. 424 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

19 Misc. 424 (Blumberg v. Bezozi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Cramer v. Medberry
17 Misc. 8 (New York Supreme Court, 1896)
Smith v. Satterlee
130 N.Y. 677 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)