Blumberg Bros. v. Odum

124 S.E. 547, 32 Ga. App. 652, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 579
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 19, 1924
Docket14889
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 124 S.E. 547 (Blumberg Bros. v. Odum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blumberg Bros. v. Odum, 124 S.E. 547, 32 Ga. App. 652, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 579 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Where a petition upon which the defendant has, before filing, acknowledged service and waived filing and process, is filed after the convening of the court to which it is returnable, and a judgment thereon rendered at that term of court, the judgment is void as to third persons. Civil Code (1910), § 5603; American Grocery Co. v. Kennedy, 100 Ga. 462 (28 S. E. 241); Ainsworth v. Mobile Fruit &c. Co., 102 Ga. 123 (29 S. E. 142); Smith v. First National Bank of Waycross, 143 Ga. 543 (85 S. E. 696). The' ruling here made and the eases cited are distinguishable from Burgin Glass Co. v. McIntire, 7 Ga. App. 755 (68 S. E. 490), where the judgment in a suit in which the defendant had waived the statutory time for filing the petition was rendered at a later term and within the statutory jurisdiction of the court as respects the actual time of filing the petition. See Ga. L. 1918, p. 345, as to the city court of Valdosta.

2. A trustee in bankruptcy represents all the creditors, and, as to the bankrupt’s property not in custody of the bankruptcy court, “shall be deemed vested with all the rights, remedies, and powers of a judgment creditor holding an execution duly returned unsatisfied” (bankruptcy act of 1898, as amended by act of 1910, § 47), and therefore is entitled, in the interest of all the creditors, to any property of funds belonging to the estate of the bankrupt as against any lien asserted by virtue of a judgment as aforesaid which is void as to third persons.

3. A judgment rendered on a money rule against a sheriff, as between the conflicting claims of the trustee in bankruptcy and such a judgment creditor whose judgment is void as to third persons, which awards the funds to the trustee in bankruptcy, is not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ogden Equipment Co. v. Talmadge Farms, Inc.
209 S.E.2d 260 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Anderson v. Hoffman
43 P.2d 644 (Montana Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 S.E. 547, 32 Ga. App. 652, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumberg-bros-v-odum-gactapp-1924.