Blum v. Parziale
277 A.D.2d 972
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 17, 1950
StatusPublished
This text of 277 A.D.2d 972 (Blum v. Parziale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blum v. Parziale, 277 A.D.2d 972 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).
Opinion
Orders affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Glennon and Van Voorhis, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion to vacate and set aside the service of the summons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-v-parziale-nyappdiv-1950.