Blum v. Jung
30 N.Y.S. 1020, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 214, 82 Hun 611
This text of 30 N.Y.S. 1020 (Blum v. Jung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blum v. Jung, 30 N.Y.S. 1020, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 214, 82 Hun 611 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
The affidavit on which the attachment was-granted was defective, in that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The order should be reversed, with. $10 costs and printing disbursements, and the motion granted, with-. $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 N.Y.S. 1020, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 214, 82 Hun 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-v-jung-nysupct-1894.