Blum v. Holley
446 U.S. 913
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 21, 1980·No. No. 79-593; No. 79-594·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Motions of respondent Holley for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 605 F. 2d 638.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blum v. Holley, 446 U.S. 913 (1980).
446 U.S. 913 (Blum v. Holley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fifield v. Bane
808 F. Supp. 210 (W.D. New York, 1992)
Tambe v. Bowen
662 F. Supp. 939 (W.D. New York, 1987)
Rahmey v. Blum
95 A.D.2d 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Johnson v. Blum
448 N.E.2d 449 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Vulcan Society of Westchester County, Inc. v. Fire Department of White Plains
533 F. Supp. 1054 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Watch v. Harris
535 F. Supp. 9 (D. Connecticut, 1981)
Calkins v. Blum
511 F. Supp. 1073 (N.D. New York, 1981)
Percey v. Blum
524 F. Supp. 324 (N.D. New York, 1981)
Markel v. Blum
509 F. Supp. 942 (N.D. New York, 1981)