Blum v. Holley
446 U.S. 913
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 21, 1980
DocketNo. 79-593; No. 79-594
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases
This text of 446 U.S. 913 (Blum v. Holley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blum v. Holley, 446 U.S. 913 (1980).
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Motions of respondent Holley for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 605 F. 2d 638.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fifield v. Bane
808 F. Supp. 210 (W.D. New York, 1992)
Tambe v. Bowen
662 F. Supp. 939 (W.D. New York, 1987)
Rahmey v. Blum
95 A.D.2d 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Johnson v. Blum
448 N.E.2d 449 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Vulcan Society of Westchester County, Inc. v. Fire Department of White Plains
533 F. Supp. 1054 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Watch v. Harris
535 F. Supp. 9 (D. Connecticut, 1981)
Calkins v. Blum
511 F. Supp. 1073 (N.D. New York, 1981)
Percey v. Blum
524 F. Supp. 324 (N.D. New York, 1981)
Markel v. Blum
509 F. Supp. 942 (N.D. New York, 1981)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
446 U.S. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-v-holley-scotus-1980.