Blum v. Federal Aviation Administration

326 F. App'x 189
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 2009
DocketNo. 08-1324
StatusPublished

This text of 326 F. App'x 189 (Blum v. Federal Aviation Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blum v. Federal Aviation Administration, 326 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth L. Blum petitions for review of the National Transportation Safety Board’s decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s order affirming the suspension of Blum’s pilot certificate. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Sturgell v. Blum, Docket SE-[190]*19018012, Order No. EA-5371 (NTSB March 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
326 F. App'x 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-v-federal-aviation-administration-ca4-2009.