Blum v. Board of Zoning & Appeals of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blum v. Board of Zoning & Appeals of North Hempstead

2 A.D.2d 992, 158 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3384

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 992 (Blum v. Board of Zoning & Appeals of North Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blum v. Board of Zoning & Appeals of North Hempstead, 2 A.D.2d 992, 158 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and section 267 of the Town Law, to review a determination of the board of zoning and appeals of the Town of North Hempstead granting (1) an application for a permit to construct a swimming pool and an accessory building in a “Residence A” district, (2) an exception to the requirements of section 280-a of the Town Law and (3) a variance of provisions in the controlling ordinance as to depth of the pool, front yard setback and percentage of building area. The appeal is from an order dismissing the petition and confirming the determination. Order unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and section 267 of the Town Law, to review a determination of the board of zoning and appeals of the Town of North Hempstead granting (1) an application for a permit to construct a swimming pool and an accessory building in a “Residence A” district, (2) an exception to the requirements of section 280-a of the Town Law and (3) a variance of provisions in the controlling ordinance as to depth of the pool, front yard setback and percentage of building area. The appeal is from an order dismissing the petition and confirming the determination. Order unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 992, 158 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-v-board-of-zoning-appeals-of-north-hempstead-nyappdiv-1956.