Blum v. Board of Education
355 N.E.2d 287, 39 N.Y.2d 984, 387 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2930
Opinions
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, on so much of the memorandum thereat-as states that the Board of Education acted properly in terminating the employment of these petitioners. With respect to the concluding two sentences of that memorandum it should be noted that, in a decision rendered simultaneously with this, we have reversed the Appellate Division’s order in Steele v Board of Educ. (52 AD2d 598). (See 40 NY2d 456.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blum v. Board of Education, 355 N.E.2d 287, 39 N.Y.2d 984, 387 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2930 (N.Y. 1976).
355 N.E.2d 287 (Blum v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kaplan v. Board of Education
56 A.D.2d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Steele v. Board of Education
354 N.E.2d 807 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)