Blum v. Blum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Blum v. Blum

13 A.2d 118, 140 Pa. Super. 72, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 417

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 24, 1940·No. Appeal, 124·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned judge of the court below, who heard this case, was of opinion that the evidence justified a decree of divorce on the ground of indignities to the person. Our review of the testimony leads us to the same conclusion. The evidence relating to cruel and barbarous treatment, while not sufficient to sustain a divorce on that ground, may be considered in connection with the charge of indignities to the person. The testimony of the respondent herself established the untrustworthiness and unreliability of her evidence.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The learned judge of the court below, who heard this case, was of opinion that the evidence justified a decree of divorce on the ground of indignities to the person. Our review of the testimony leads us to the same conclusion. The evidence relating to cruel and barbarous treatment, while not sufficient to sustain a divorce on that ground, may be considered in connection with the charge of indignities to the person. The testimony of the respondent herself established the untrustworthiness and unreliability of her evidence.

Decree affirmed.

Blum v. Blum, 13 A.2d 118, 140 Pa. Super. 72, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 417 (Pa. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

13 A.2d 118 (Blum v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related