Blum v. Blum

13 A.2d 118, 140 Pa. Super. 72, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 417
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 24, 1940
DocketAppeal, 124
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 13 A.2d 118 (Blum v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blum v. Blum, 13 A.2d 118, 140 Pa. Super. 72, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 417 (Pa. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned judge of the court below, who heard this case, was of opinion that the evidence justified a decree of divorce on the ground of indignities to the person. Our review of the testimony leads us to the same conclusion. The evidence relating to cruel and barbarous treatment, while not sufficient to sustain a divorce on that ground, may be considered in connection with the charge of indignities to the person. The testimony of the respondent herself established the untrustworthiness and unreliability of her evidence.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boniewicz v. Boniewicz
403 A.2d 999 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Worobey v. Worobey
190 A.2d 167 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 A.2d 118, 140 Pa. Super. 72, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-v-blum-pasuperct-1940.