Blum v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blum v. Blum

20 A.D.2d 561, 246 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2620

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 561 (Blum v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blum v. Blum, 20 A.D.2d 561, 246 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a wife for a judicial separation, in which a judgment had been entered in her favor awarding to her $150 a week permanent alimony (on which the husband paid the income taxes), the wife appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 15, 1963 after a non jury trial before a Special Referee, granting the wife’s motion to increase the amount of such alimony, as: (1) limited such increase to $50 and fixed the alimony at $200 per week, effective November 8, 1962; and (2) limited to $1,500 the award to her of counsel fees. Order affirmed, without costs. On the record before us it does not appear with sufficient certainty that the husband’s income or the value of his asséts warrants a greater increase in the alimony at the present time. [For prior appeal, see 11 A D 2d 1064.] Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a wife for a judicial separation, in which a judgment had been entered in her favor awarding to her $150 a week permanent alimony (on which the husband paid the income taxes), the wife appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 15, 1963 after a non jury trial before a Special Referee, granting the wife’s motion to increase the amount of such alimony, as: (1) limited such increase to $50 and fixed the alimony at $200 per week, effective November 8, 1962; and (2) limited to $1,500 the award to her of counsel fees. Order affirmed, without costs. On the record before us it does not appear with sufficient certainty that the husband’s income or the value of his asséts warrants a greater increase in the alimony at the present time. [For prior appeal, see 11 A D 2d 1064.] Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 561, 246 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-v-blum-nyappdiv-1963.