Blum v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blum v. Blum

17 A.D.2d 846, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7587

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 846 (Blum v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blum v. Blum, 17 A.D.2d 846, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to declare as terminated a certain written agreement among the plaintiff, the defendant Ida Blum (plaintiff’s wife) and the remaining defendants as eserowees, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 19, 1962, which (a) denied his motion for summary judgment as prayed for in the complaint; (b) granted the cross motion of the defendant Ida Blum for summary judgment dismissing the complaint; and (c) directed the entry of judgment in favor of said defendant and the defendants-escrowees dismissing the complaint. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to defendant Ida Blum. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to declare as terminated a certain written agreement among the plaintiff, the defendant Ida Blum (plaintiff’s wife) and the remaining defendants as eserowees, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 19, 1962, which (a) denied his motion for summary judgment as prayed for in the complaint; (b) granted the cross motion of the defendant Ida Blum for summary judgment dismissing the complaint; and (c) directed the entry of judgment in favor of said defendant and the defendants-escrowees dismissing the complaint. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to defendant Ida Blum. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 846, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-v-blum-nyappdiv-1962.