Blum v. Blum

258 A.D. 733, 15 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6688

Opinion

Action for separation. Judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs., Ho opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blum v. Blum, 258 A.D. 733, 15 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 733 (Blum v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.