Blum v. Blum

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blum v. Blum

783 So. 2d 1122, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3483, 2001 WL 276877

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 21, 2001

DocketNo. 4D99-4259

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 783 So. 2d 1122 (Blum v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blum v. Blum, 783 So. 2d 1122, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3483, 2001 WL 276877 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage in all respects, finding no merit in any of the points raised by the former wife. As to the issue of the determination that the former husband would be responsible for some portion of the wife’s attorney’s fees, we are without jurisdiction, and therefore dismiss without prejudice. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage in all respects, finding no merit in any of the points raised by the former wife. As to the issue of the determination that the former husband would be responsible for some portion of the wife’s attorney’s fees, we are without jurisdiction, and therefore dismiss without prejudice. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

783 So. 2d 1122, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3483, 2001 WL 276877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-v-blum-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack