Blum Bros. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Blum Bros. v. United States

19 Cust. Ct. 98, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 931

United States Customs Court·Decided June 18, 1947·No. No. 51791; protests 65000-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to the Romano, Pecorino Romano, Sardo, or Provolone cheese the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2% percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to the Romano, Pecorino Romano, Sardo, or Provolone cheese the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2% percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Blum Bros. v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 98, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 931 (cusc 1947).

Pincite

19 Cust. Ct. 98 (Blum Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related