Blum and Sang v. KURTZON AND KURTZON
113 N.E.2d 475, 351 Ill. App. 107
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedAugust 4, 1953
DocketGen. No. 45,672
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 113 N.E.2d 475 (Blum and Sang v. KURTZON AND KURTZON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blum and Sang v. KURTZON AND KURTZON, 113 N.E.2d 475, 351 Ill. App. 107 (Ill. Ct. App. 1953).
Opinion
Blum and Sang, Appellees,
v.
Morris Kurtzon and Celia Kurtzon, Appellants.
Illinois Appellate Court.
Heineman & Langsett, for appellants.
Frederie W. Heineman, Paul A.H. Shults, and Robert M. Grossmann, of counsel.
Francis X. Busch, and Vincent J. Carney, for appellees.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE ROBSON.
Reversed and remanded.
Not to be published in full.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Laff v. Chapman Performance Products, Inc.
379 N.E.2d 773 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
113 N.E.2d 475, 351 Ill. App. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blum-and-sang-v-kurtzon-and-kurtzon-illappct-1953.