Bluett v. State

527 S.W.3d 166, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 847, 2017 WL 3707099
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 29, 2017
DocketWD 79992
StatusPublished

This text of 527 S.W.3d 166 (Bluett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bluett v. State, 527 S.W.3d 166, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 847, 2017 WL 3707099 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Bluett appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. Bluett’s motion follows his convictions for one count of murder in the first degree and one count of armed criminal action. Bluett argues that the motion court erred in denying his claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for not calling two witnesses and failing to demonstrate to the jury that he had no neck tattoos. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 S.W.3d 166, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 847, 2017 WL 3707099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bluett-v-state-moctapp-2017.