Bluestein v. State

178 S.E. 423, 50 Ga. App. 580, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 582
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 17, 1934·No. 24224·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The accused was convicted of arson, and his motion for a new trial contained the general grounds only. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to establish the corpus delicti, and to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of the guilt of the defendant. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bluestein v. State, 178 S.E. 423, 50 Ga. App. 580, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 582 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

178 S.E. 423 (Bluestein v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGullion v. State
276 So. 2d 640 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Lowery v. State
88 So. 2d 854 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1956)
Whatley v. State
75 So. 2d 182 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1954)