Bluestein v. Bluestein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bluestein v. Bluestein

289 A.D.2d 435, 735 N.Y.S.2d 406, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12999

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 289 A.D.2d 435 (Bluestein v. Bluestein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bluestein v. Bluestein, 289 A.D.2d 435, 735 N.Y.S.2d 406, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated October 31, 2000.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The judgment challenged herein was superseded by an amended judgment entered February 22, 2001, from which the parties have filed notices of appeal and cross-appeal (App Div Docket No. 2001-02782). This appeal must therefore be dismissed (see, Alpha Auto Brokers v Continental Ins. Co., 286 AD2d 309; Matter of UPROSE v Power Auth., 285 AD2d 603, lv denied 97 NY2d 605; Weston v City of New York, 282 AD2d 525). Altman, J. P., Smith, Adams and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated October 31, 2000.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The judgment challenged herein was superseded by an amended judgment entered February 22, 2001, from which the parties have filed notices of appeal and cross-appeal (App Div Docket No. 2001-02782). This appeal must therefore be dismissed (see, Alpha Auto Brokers v Continental Ins. Co., 286 AD2d 309; Matter of UPROSE v Power Auth., 285 AD2d 603, lv denied 97 NY2d 605; Weston v City of New York, 282 AD2d 525). Altman, J. P., Smith, Adams and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 435, 735 N.Y.S.2d 406, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bluestein-v-bluestein-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack