Bluestein v. Bluestein

958 So. 2d 1040, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8722, 2007 WL 1593247
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 2007·No. No. 1D06-6398·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Keith Bluestein appeals an order denying motions for termination of alimony and for relief from a consent order, wherein the circuit court sua sponte modified the visitation arrangement. We reverse.

Contrary to the lower court’s findings, neither party had raised an issue of visitation, nor had the parties argued it by consent at the hearing. See Walls v. Sebastian, 914 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Because all parties were by then residing in Virginia, it is questionable whether the circuit court would have had jurisdiction to reach the issue, had it been raised. See § 61.515, Fla. Stat. (2005). We direct the court to strike that portion of the order dealing with visitation.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BENTON, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bluestein v. Bluestein, 958 So. 2d 1040, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8722, 2007 WL 1593247 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

958 So. 2d 1040 (Bluestein v. Bluestein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walls v. Sebastian
914 So. 2d 1110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)