Blueprint Plumbing Corp. v. Kreisler Borg Florman Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blueprint Plumbing Corp. v. Kreisler Borg Florman Construction Co.

147 A.D.2d 518, 537 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1616

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 A.D.2d 518 (Blueprint Plumbing Corp. v. Kreisler Borg Florman Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blueprint Plumbing Corp. v. Kreisler Borg Florman Construction Co., 147 A.D.2d 518, 537 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an insurance contract, (1) the defendants Raypak, Inc., and Cushing Equipment, Ltd., appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Reilly, J.H.O.), dated October 15, 1987, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, was in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $19,609.42, (2) the defendant Webster Plumbing Supply, Inc., separately appeals from so much of the same judgment as is in favor of the plaintiff and against it, and (3) the defendant United States Fire Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same judgment as awarded legal fees to the plaintiff.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from by United States Fire Insurance Company, on the law, and the plaintiff’s application for legal fees is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeals of the defendants Raypak, Inc., and Cushing Equipment, Ltd., and the appeal of the defendant Webster Plumbing Supply, Inc., are dismissed, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.20 [d], [f]).

Ordered that United States Fire Insurance Company is awarded one bill of costs payable by Blueprint Plumbing Corporation.

We agree with the defendant United States Fire Insurance Company that the Supreme Court erred as a matter of law in awarding legal fees to the plaintiff. It is the rule in this State that the award of legal fees "may not be had in an affirmative action brought by an injured to settle its rights * * * but only when the insured has been cast in a defensive posture by the [519]*519legal steps an insurer takes in an effort to free itself from its policy obligations” (Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 NY2d 12, 21; see also, Johnson v General Mut. Ins. Co., 24 NY2d 42). Since the cause of action asserted against the United States Fire Insurance Company amounted to an affirmative action by the insured to settle its rights, the plaintiff was not entitled to an award of legal fees. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an insurance contract, (1) the defendants Raypak, Inc., and Cushing Equipment, Ltd., appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Reilly, J.H.O.), dated October 15, 1987, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, was in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $19,609.42, (2) the defendant Webster Plumbing Supply, Inc., separately appeals from so much of the same judgment as is in favor of the plaintiff and against it, and (3) the defendant United States Fire Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same judgment as awarded legal fees to the plaintiff.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from by United States Fire Insurance Company, on the law, and the plaintiff’s application for legal fees is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeals of the defendants Raypak, Inc., and Cushing Equipment, Ltd., and the appeal of the defendant Webster Plumbing Supply, Inc., are dismissed, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.20 [d], [f]).

Ordered that United States Fire Insurance Company is awarded one bill of costs payable by Blueprint Plumbing Corporation.

We agree with the defendant United States Fire Insurance Company that the Supreme Court erred as a matter of law in awarding legal fees to the plaintiff. It is the rule in this State that the award of legal fees "may not be had in an affirmative action brought by an injured to settle its rights * * * but only when the insured has been cast in a defensive posture by the [519]*519legal steps an insurer takes in an effort to free itself from its policy obligations” (Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 NY2d 12, 21; see also, Johnson v General Mut. Ins. Co., 24 NY2d 42). Since the cause of action asserted against the United States Fire Insurance Company amounted to an affirmative action by the insured to settle its rights, the plaintiff was not entitled to an award of legal fees. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A.D.2d 518, 537 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blueprint-plumbing-corp-v-kreisler-borg-florman-construction-co-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack