Bluefeld v. Cohen

678 F. App'x 100
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2017·No. No. 16-2207·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barry J. Bluefeld seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to strike certain correspondence. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P, 64(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Bluefeld seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny the Appellees’ motions to strike and for sane-[101] tions, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bluefeld v. Cohen, 678 F. App'x 100 (4th Cir. 2017).

678 F. App'x 100 (Bluefeld v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)