Blue v. State

508 S.W.3d 171, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1227, 2016 WL 6956749
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 29, 2016
DocketED 103686
StatusPublished

This text of 508 S.W.3d 171 (Blue v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blue v. State, 508 S.W.3d 171, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1227, 2016 WL 6956749 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Blue (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
508 S.W.3d 171, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1227, 2016 WL 6956749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blue-v-state-moctapp-2016.