Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Blue v. State

Blue v. State

698 S.W.2d 302, 287 Ark. 345, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2254
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 12, 1985
DocketCR 85-92
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 698 S.W.2d 302 (Blue v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blue v. State, 698 S.W.2d 302, 287 Ark. 345, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2254 (Ark. 1985).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Jackie Blue, asks to be allowed to file a pro se brief to supplement his court-appointed attorney’s brief. The attorney filed what amounts to a “no merit” brief in petitioner’s behalf in his appeal from a denial of post-conviction relief.

In order to file a “no merit” brief, petitioner’s attorney must file a motion for permission to withdraw as counsel and further comply with Ark. Sup. Ct. Rule 11 (h). Petitioner will then be given 30 days in which to file a pro se supplemental brief pursuant to Rule 11 (h).

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gill v. State
2017 Ark. App. 22 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2017)
McCoy v. State
49 S.W.3d 154 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2001)
Harris v. State
35 S.W.3d 819 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 S.W.2d 302, 287 Ark. 345, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blue-v-state-ark-1985.