Blue v. State

698 S.W.2d 302, 287 Ark. 345, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2254
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 12, 1985·No. CR 85-92·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Jackie Blue, asks to be allowed to file a pro se brief to supplement his court-appointed attorney’s brief. The attorney filed what amounts to a “no merit” brief in petitioner’s behalf in his appeal from a denial of post-conviction relief.

In order to file a “no merit” brief, petitioner’s attorney must file a motion for permission to withdraw as counsel and further comply with Ark. Sup. Ct. Rule 11 (h). Petitioner will then be given 30 days in which to file a pro se supplemental brief pursuant to Rule 11 (h).

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blue v. State, 698 S.W.2d 302, 287 Ark. 345, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2254 (Ark. 1985).

698 S.W.2d 302 (Blue v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gill v. State
2017 Ark. App. 22 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2017)
McCoy v. State
49 S.W.3d 154 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2001)
Harris v. State
35 S.W.3d 819 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2000)