Blue Sr., Roy Rice v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 19, 2003
• Docket: 14-02-00536-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed June 19, 2003

Affirmed and Opinion filed June 19, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-00536-CR

ROY RICE BLUE, SR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 902,446

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty, without an agreed recommendation as to sentencing, to the offense of sexual assault of a child.  On April 17, 2002, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 25 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed June 19, 2003.

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Seymore, and Guzman.

Do Not Publish CTex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).