Blue Lands Development, Inc. v. Broadus
This text of 396 So. 2d 69 (Blue Lands Development, Inc. v. Broadus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issue presented: Absent consent of a life tenant, can a cotenant (joint owner of a vested remainder interest in real property) maintain an action to partition or sell for partition pursuant to Code 1975, § 35-6-20, subject-to the existing life estate?
[70]*70The trial court answered this question in the negative, dismissing the suit for partition or sale for division of the proceeds. We affirm on the authority of Chapman v. York, 208 Ala. 274, 94 So. 90 (1922). See, also, Bedsole v. Bedsole, 272 Ala. 589, 133 So.2d 237 (1961); and Michael v. Davis, 372 So.2d 304 (Ala.1979). For an excellent statement of the rule and its rationale, see 59 Am.Jur.2d Partition § 170 (1971).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
396 So. 2d 69, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blue-lands-development-inc-v-broadus-ala-1981.