Blue Grass Mining Co. v. Richardson

Sixth Circuit

Blue Grass Mining Co. v. Richardson

127 F.2d 291, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3852

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 2, 1942·No. 8870, 8871·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These causes, which were consolidated for hearing, having been submitted on oral argument, briefs of counsel, and the six-volume record, and the court, having duly considered and deliberated upon the same, is of opinion that the District Court correctly decided all the issues involved, for the reasons clearly and fully appearing in the opinion, findings of fact (supported by substantial evidence), and conclusions of law of the district judge.

Accordingly, the decree of the district court, 29 F.Supp. 658, is, in all particulars, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These causes, which were consolidated for hearing, having been submitted on oral argument, briefs of counsel, and the six-volume record, and the court, having duly considered and deliberated upon the same, is of opinion that the District Court correctly decided all the issues involved, for the reasons clearly and fully appearing in the opinion, findings of fact (supported by substantial evidence), and conclusions of law of the district judge.

Accordingly, the decree of the district court, 29 F.Supp. 658, is, in all particulars, affirmed.

Blue Grass Mining Co. v. Richardson, 127 F.2d 291, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3852 (6th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

127 F.2d 291 (Blue Grass Mining Co. v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related