Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. v. Steck
This text of 818 So. 2d 465 (Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. v. Steck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have for review Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. v. Steck, 778 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), based on apparent conflict with American Heritage Life Insurance Co. v. English, 786 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Both cases concern the applicability of an intoxication exclusion in an insurance policy. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
Upon further consideration, we find no conflict. Not only are the policy provisions 1 and factual underpinnings2 of these two cases substantially different, the insurance policies themselves are different in kind. The policy in Steck was a health insurance policy; the policy in English was a fife insurance policy. The parties have cited specific statutory provisions governing intoxication exclusions in health [466]*466insurance policies,3 but they have cited no similar statutory provisions governing intoxication exclusions in life insurance policies.
We dismiss Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. v. Steck, 778 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
It is’so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
818 So. 2d 465, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 322, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 633, 2002 WL 534610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blue-cross-blue-shield-of-florida-inc-v-steck-fla-2002.