Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. RYDER TRUCK
This text of 498 So. 2d 423 (Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. RYDER TRUCK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC., Petitioner,
v.
RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida.
H. Lawrence Hardy of Milton R. Adkins, P.A., Coral Gables, for petitioner.
Andrew Needle of Spence, Payne, Masington, Grossman and Needle, P.A., and Steven C. Marks of Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow and Olin, P.A., Miami, for respondents.
Raymond T. Elligett, Jr. and Charles P. Schropp of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings *424 and Evans, Tampa, for Jack Eckerd Corp., amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
We have jurisdiction to review Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 472 So.2d 1373 (Fla.3d DCA 1985), under article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. This cause presents the same issues of law and fact as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. v. Matthews, 498 So.2d 421 (Fla. 1986). The district court below held that Blue Cross had no right of subrogation or indemnification against Ryder. We quash and remand to allow petitioner to replead in light of Matthews.
It is so ordered.
McDONALD, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
498 So. 2d 423, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 564, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blue-cross-and-blue-shield-v-ryder-truck-fla-1986.