Blowe v. State

653 So. 2d 497, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4182, 1995 WL 232588
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 1995·No. No. 95-418·Published

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

Appellant claims in his Rule 3.800(a) motion that the trial court erroneously calculated the amount of credit he was due for time served. After reviewing the record, we agree. This court reversed appellant’s original sentence because it exceeded the statutory maximum. Blowe v. State, 621 So.2d 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). When the trial court resentenced appellant, it awarded credit for the time appellant had served in prison while the appeal of the original sentence was pending, but it did not award credit for the time appellant spent in jail prior to the original sentence as required by section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1993). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blowe v. State, 653 So. 2d 497, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4182, 1995 WL 232588 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

653 So. 2d 497 (Blowe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blowe v. State
621 So. 2d 587 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)