Blow v. White

Supreme Court of Georgia

Blow v. White

41 Ga. 293

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1870

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 41 Ga. 293 (Blow v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blow v. White, 41 Ga. 293 (Ga. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court—

BROWN, C. J.,

delivering the opinion.

We can not say that the Judge on the trial of this case gave the Ordinance of 186S in charge to the jury as distinctly as it should have been done. But we hold that the defendant was the party who had a right to complain. As the jury found the specie value of the Confederate notes at the time of the loan, we think substantial justice has been done.

If the charge is wrong, and the verdict clearly right, we will not grant a new trial because the jury did not 'find in conformity to the charge.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court—

BROWN, C. J.,

delivering the opinion.

We can not say that the Judge on the trial of this case gave the Ordinance of 186S in charge to the jury as distinctly as it should have been done. But we hold that the defendant was the party who had a right to complain. As the jury found the specie value of the Confederate notes at the time of the loan, we think substantial justice has been done.

If the charge is wrong, and the verdict clearly right, we will not grant a new trial because the jury did not 'find in conformity to the charge.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Ga. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blow-v-white-ga-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack