Blow v. White

41 Ga. 293
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court—

BROWN, C. J.,

delivering the opinion.

We can not say that the Judge on the trial of this case gave the Ordinance of 186S in charge to the jury as distinctly as it should have been done. But we hold that the defendant was the party who had a right to complain. As the jury found the specie value of the Confederate notes at the time of the loan, we think substantial justice has been done.

If the charge is wrong, and the verdict clearly right, we will not grant a new trial because the jury did not 'find in conformity to the charge.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blow v. White, 41 Ga. 293 (Ga. 1870).

41 Ga. 293 (Blow v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warnell v. Ponder
187 S.E. 261 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Norman, Timmons & Co. v. Smith
61 S.E. 1039 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)