Blow v. Stansberry

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 26, 2009
Docket08-8358
StatusUnpublished

This text of Blow v. Stansberry (Blow v. Stansberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blow v. Stansberry, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8358

ANTONIO CHARLES BLOW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN STANSBERRY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00426-RGD-TEM)

Submitted: May 14, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Charles Blow, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Antonio Charles Blow, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Blow v. Stansberry, No. 2:08-cv-00426-

RGD-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Blow v. Stansberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blow-v-stansberry-ca4-2009.