Blow v. Stansberry
This text of Blow v. Stansberry (Blow v. Stansberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8358
ANTONIO CHARLES BLOW,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN STANSBERRY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00426-RGD-TEM)
Submitted: May 14, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Charles Blow, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Antonio Charles Blow, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Blow v. Stansberry, No. 2:08-cv-00426-
RGD-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Blow v. Stansberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blow-v-stansberry-ca4-2009.