Blow v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

95 F. App'x 35
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2004
DocketNo. 03-2335
StatusPublished

This text of 95 F. App'x 35 (Blow v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blow v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 95 F. App'x 35 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Blow seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in his action under the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (2000), in which he attacked an arbitrator’s decision in favor of his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Blow v. Philip Morris USA No. CA-03-201 (E.D.Va. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 F. App'x 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blow-v-philip-morris-usa-inc-ca4-2004.