Blow v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
This text of 95 F. App'x 35 (Blow v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jerry Blow seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in his action under the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (2000), in which he attacked an arbitrator’s decision in favor of his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Blow v. Philip Morris USA No. CA-03-201 (E.D.Va. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 F. App'x 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blow-v-philip-morris-usa-inc-ca4-2004.