Blountstown Manufacturing Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Florida

Blountstown Manufacturing Co. v. Miller

111 So. 256, 92 Fla. 1138

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 10, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and upon briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Strum and Brown, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Buford, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and upon briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Strum and Brown, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Buford, J., dissent.

Blountstown Manufacturing Co. v. Miller, 111 So. 256, 92 Fla. 1138 (Fla. 1927).

Pincite

111 So. 256 (Blountstown Manufacturing Co. v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.