Blount v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 12, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-06132·Unknown

Opinion

USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 11/12/21

Barbara C. Blount, Plaintiff, 21-CV-6132 (RA) v. ORDER United States of America, Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty- day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2021 New York, New York / J Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blount v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Blount v. United States (Blount v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hendrickson v. United States
791 F.3d 354 (Second Circuit, 2015)