Blount v. Tomlin
26 Ill. 531
This text of 26 Ill. 531 (Blount v. Tomlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blount v. Tomlin, 26 Ill. 531 (Ill. 1862).
Opinion
The making a writ of error operate as a supersedeas where an injunction has been dissolved, does not revive the injunction. For that purpose, a special order is required. The act complained of was not in contempt of the order of the court. ■
Motion denied.
Note.—This and the two following decisions were made at January term, 1862, in the Second Grand Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of Supervisors
168 S.E. 617 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1933)
Bill Board Publishing Co. v. McCarahan
180 Ill. App. 542 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 Ill. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blount-v-tomlin-ill-1862.