Blount v. Tomlin
26 Ill. 531
Opinion
The making a writ of error operate as a supersedeas where an injunction has been dissolved, does not revive the injunction. For that purpose, a special order is required. The act complained of was not in contempt of the order of the court. ■
Motion denied.
Note.—This and the two following decisions were made at January term, 1862, in the Second Grand Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blount v. Tomlin, 26 Ill. 531 (Ill. 1862).
26 Ill. 531 (Blount v. Tomlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of Supervisors
168 S.E. 617 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1933)
Bill Board Publishing Co. v. McCarahan
180 Ill. App. 542 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1913)