Blount v. State

654 So. 2d 126, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 227, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 684, 1995 WL 256216
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 1995
DocketNo. 84315
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 654 So. 2d 126 (Blount v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blount v. State, 654 So. 2d 126, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 227, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 684, 1995 WL 256216 (Fla. 1995).

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Blount v. State, 641 So.2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), wherein the district court relied on Bouters v. State, 634 [127]*127So.2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), to affirm a trial court order finding Florida’s stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), constitutional. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently reviewed Bouters and found the statute constitutional. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, — So.2d — [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve the district court decision in Blount

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
658 So. 2d 665 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 So. 2d 126, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 227, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 684, 1995 WL 256216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blount-v-state-fla-1995.