Blount v. Starkley's administrators

3 N.C. 75
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided March 15, 1799·Published

Opinion

PER curiam,

An order lor mnr.w sent to the plaintiff and retained bji him,, is evidence t..at the money was advanced, as the order directs but an order for delivery of goods retained* is not of itself sufficient evidence of the delivery — -there should be some additional evidence to prove that fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blount v. Starkley's administrators, 3 N.C. 75 (N.C. Ct. App. 1799).

3 N.C. 75 (Blount v. Starkley's administrators) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.