Blount v. . Starkey

Superior Court of North Carolina

Blount v. . Starkey

1 N.C. 157

DecidedJuly 5, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 157 (Blount v. . Starkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blount v. . Starkey, 1 N.C. 157 (N.C. Ct. App. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

In this case it was held by the Court that an order drawn by the defendant upon the plaintiff for the payment of money, and by him retained, is evidence that the money was advanced, agreeably to the directions of the order; but that an order under the same circumstances, for the delivery of goods, is not of itself evidence of the delivery; to prove that fact, additional evidence is necessary.

Cited: Kennedy v. Williamson, 50 N.C. 287.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this case it was held by the Court that an order drawn by the defendant upon the plaintiff for the payment of money, and by him retained, is evidence that the money was advanced, agreeably to the directions of the order; but that an order under the same circumstances, for the delivery of goods, is not of itself evidence of the delivery; to prove that fact, additional evidence is necessary.

Cited: Kennedy v. Williamson, 50 N.C. 287.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blount-v-starkey-ncsuperct-1799.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack