Blount v. Stanley.

3 N.C. 163
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1802·Published

Opinion

Johnston, judge.

That clause must be confined to depositions to be taken in this state,.there are some counties where there' are no Justices of the Peace.. If the clause in question extends to all depositions, It would many times happen that the deposition could not be taken at all for want of Justices.

The deposition was read»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blount v. Stanley., 3 N.C. 163 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

3 N.C. 163 (Blount v. Stanley.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.