Blount v. Empire Mutual Insurance

196 A.2d 334, 413 Pa. 100, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 625
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 7, 1964
DocketAppeal, No. 122
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 A.2d 334 (Blount v. Empire Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blount v. Empire Mutual Insurance, 196 A.2d 334, 413 Pa. 100, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 625 (Pa. 1964).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chirp Justice Bell,

Plaintiff was employed by defendant as its attorney for a period of one year at a salary or retainer of [101]*101$8,500. After several months defendant discharged plaintiff without justifiable cause. Plaintiff thereafter sued defendant for the unpaid balance of his salary and for the sum of $1,000 for extra services which were not included in his aforesaid retainer fee. Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $7,438 which represented both items. Defendant’s motion for a new trial based on alleged trial errors was dismissed. From a judgment entered on the verdict, defendant has taken this appeal.

In this appeal, defendant contends that plaintiff is entitled to recover for breach of his retainer fee contract only on a quantum meruit basis, but does not contend that the damages recoverable should be mitigated and reduced by the fees which were earned by plaintiff during the balance of that year. Probably the reason no such contention was made is because of the difficulty, indeed the practical impossibility, of proof on this point. Since plaintiff’s contract permitted him to represent clients other than the defendant it would not have been possible to prove with the “reasonable certainty” which the law requires (Adams v. Speckman, 385 Pa. 308, 122 A. 2d 685) what fees were earned in diminution of plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract. A vain thing was not within the contemplation of the parties.

We have considered but find no merit in any of defendant’s contentions.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 A.2d 334, 413 Pa. 100, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blount-v-empire-mutual-insurance-pa-1964.