Blount v. Blount

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blount v. Blount

200 A.D.2d 536, 608 N.Y.S.2d 819

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 27, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered February 26, 1992, which denied defendant’s motion seeking arrears of interest payments and attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the defendant received semi-annual interest payments, as of July 1, 1991, inasmuch as the marital residence had not sold prior to that date. The court properly interpreted the terms of the January 21, 1991 Settlement Agreement by finding that interest was not due prior to that date. Accordingly, there is no basis for an award of attorneys’ fees to the defendant. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered February 26, 1992, which denied defendant’s motion seeking arrears of interest payments and attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the defendant received semi-annual interest payments, as of July 1, 1991, inasmuch as the marital residence had not sold prior to that date. The court properly interpreted the terms of the January 21, 1991 Settlement Agreement by finding that interest was not due prior to that date. Accordingly, there is no basis for an award of attorneys’ fees to the defendant. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Blount v. Blount, 200 A.D.2d 536, 608 N.Y.S.2d 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

200 A.D.2d 536 (Blount v. Blount) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.