Blouin v. Ferguson
This text of 372 So. 2d 194 (Blouin v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judicial referee lost jurisdiction after the expiration of the time limits of a medical mediation proceeding and he, sitting alone, could not commence the proceeding within the time period for purposes of extending the time. See: Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Therefore, the rule nisi in prohibition issued heretofore is made absolute. Assuming that the trial judge will follow the dictates of this opinion, the rule absolute will not be served unless necessary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
372 So. 2d 194, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blouin-v-ferguson-fladistctapp-1979.