Blotcher v. Metropolitan District Commission

487 N.E.2d 863, 21 Mass. App. Ct. 955, 1986 Mass. App. LEXIS 1608
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided January 16, 1986·Published

Opinion

We would have supposed that the plaintiffs’ lack of standing to maintain the present action was made clear by what we said in Knowles v. Codex Corp., 12 Mass. App. Ct. 493, 495-496, 498-499 (1981), but we concur in the additional reasons for dismissal which were given by the motion judge in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blotcher v. Metropolitan District Commission, 487 N.E.2d 863, 21 Mass. App. Ct. 955, 1986 Mass. App. LEXIS 1608 (Mass. Ct. App. 1986).

487 N.E.2d 863 (Blotcher v. Metropolitan District Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knowles v. Codex Corp.
426 N.E.2d 734 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1981)