Bloss v. Pure Oil Co.
230 A.D. 749
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground of error in the charge in respect to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitür which had no application in the case and was prejudicial. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., dissent and vote for affirmance. [133 Misc. 486.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bloss v. Pure Oil Co., 230 A.D. 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
230 A.D. 749 (Bloss v. Pure Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bloss v. Pure Oil Co.
133 Misc. 486 (New York Supreme Court, 1929)