Home/U.S. Customs Court/Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States

Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 443
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 25, 1961
DocketNo. 65510; protests 233362-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 443 (Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 443 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cust. Ct. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloomingdale-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1961.