Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 527
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 16, 1958
DocketNo. 61835; protest 237578-K (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 527 (Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 527 (cusc 1958).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorated earthenware articles, composed of a non-vitrified absorbent body, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Abstract 51831 followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 Cust. Ct. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloomingdale-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1958.