Bloomingdale Bros. v. Butler

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Bloomingdale Bros. v. Butler

150 Misc. 903, 270 N.Y.S. 624, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1199

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A pilot is a seaman within the provisions of section 601 of title 46 of the United States Code. (Somers v. Jersey Blue, 22 Fed. Cas. 13,169; Duggar v. Mobile & Gulf Nav. Co., 224 Ala. 359; 140 So. 611.) His wages, therefore, are exempt from garnishment. There is nothing in the record showing that the statute pertaining to coastwise trade (U. S. Code, tit. 46, § 544; Duggar v. Mobile & Gulf Nav. Co., supra) is applicable.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A pilot is a seaman within the provisions of section 601 of title 46 of the United States Code. (Somers v. Jersey Blue, 22 Fed. Cas. 13,169; Duggar v. Mobile & Gulf Nav. Co., 224 Ala. 359; 140 So. 611.) His wages, therefore, are exempt from garnishment. There is nothing in the record showing that the statute pertaining to coastwise trade (U. S. Code, tit. 46, § 544; Duggar v. Mobile & Gulf Nav. Co., supra) is applicable.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Bloomingdale Bros. v. Butler, 150 Misc. 903, 270 N.Y.S. 624, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

150 Misc. 903 (Bloomingdale Bros. v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related